Final Exam

Final ExamAnswer to Question 1 . Generally sharp-witted draw up hypothesis rests on the assumption that singulars ar rational , that is , decision-making is by and large based on the ability of a person to depend cost and benefits . The main propositions of the conjecture are as follows : 1 ) when choosing an option , the rational someone go forth of caterpillar track engage the option where benefits outweigh be , 2 ) when the options result meet be only to the case-by-case , the individual go away course choose the option that minimizes costs , 3 ) when the individual is glide path with options that offer short and semipermanent benefits , the individual almost always will choose the option that offers long-term benefits , 4 ) and relationships are formed because of the utility of the relationship albeit in the calculation of costs and benefits . Cornish and Clarke (1986 ) describe abuse as an event or series of events that occurs when an individual risks breaking the faithfulness , considering his /her own contingencies , beliefs , and habitual mood . In this application of rational choice theory to the study of offense , an individual naturally weighs the costs of the crime to its potency benefits . The costs are as follows : 1 ) the luck of being captured , 2 ) the degree of the penalization , 3 ) and the probable loss of trust to many sight . The benefits are as follows : 1 ) the value gained from believeting the crime , 2 ) links with other wrongdoers created , 3 ) and immediate worth or price of the determine gained . Here the offender will adjudicate to discern the potential degree of each cost and benefits . If the costs outweigh the benefits the offender will naturally minimize the costs by employing strategies to invalidate capture . In the case of would-be(pre nominal) offenders , they will naturally det! er from committing the act . The response of presidency agencies then will naturally focus on crime-prevention . The closing is to reduce the likelihood that a would-be offender to commit crime . In this case , the agencies snarly will establish severe penalties , in this case death penalty to strain that goal . For the agencies involved , death penalty is a pricy risk for a would-be offender hence he /she will be prevented from committing a criminal actAnswer to Question 2 . Labeling theory is relatively a new field in sociology . It bear be said that it is rooted from symbolic sink proceedingism . Symbolic interactionism posits that each individual creates images of his /her environment based on his /her interpretation of it . Labeling theory is an approach of symbolic interactionism that focuses more on deviance . According to a variant of this approach (some sociologists vie that this is not an approach , quite a new theory on social action , people engage in rule-br eaking behavior because they perceived themselves as different from the rule-abiding members of the society (Becker , 1963 . It can be said that they are morally in contradict with the mainstream society . Hence they are termed as outsiders This first mensuration is called primary deviance . The import step involves making a career out of crime . The people involved ordinarily accept the deviant...If you want to watch a full essay, hunting lodge it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay